Is Reading Still Necessary in the Age of AI and Video?

by San San
A+A-
Reset

Once, a new friend caught me deeply absorbed in a book and looked quite surprised. They asked me a very blunt question: “Now that we have video and AI, and everything is so fast and convenient… why do you still choose this slow way of doing things?”

I understood their confusion. Truthfully, it’s a very practical question: If a few minutes of a video summary can give you the main points, why spend hours flipping through pages that might not even “click” immediately? It’s a valid question, and because it’s valid, it deserves our serious thought.

When Knowledge Matters More Than the Medium

I am not a “book worshiper” in an extremist sense. To me, a book has never been the destination; it’s just a path to reach the doorway of knowledge. If someone can learn through videos or online courses and still achieve a “perfect score” in understanding and applying it to life, they have every right not to read. What we should respect is the insight gained, not the method used to get there.

However, the problem is this: not every path leads to the same depth. Information can be “picked up” very quickly, but knowledge—the kind that actually molds how we think and perceive the world—is not easily acquired through mere “scrolling.”

“Information helps you know, but only knowledge helps you truly understand.”

The Depth of Content: Something Videos Struggle to Touch

A video can be produced in a few weeks, or even a few hours for shorter content. But a book—especially a technical or scholarly one—is often the crystallization of years, if not a lifetime. It’s not just the pure writing time; it’s the rigorous process of accumulating, distilling, and systematizing thought.

When you hold a book, you are actually embarking on an author’s long-term intellectual journey. It isn’t a superficial few-minute summary; it is a system of knowledge built with intention and passion.

“Reading a book isn’t just about reading words; it’s about traveling through the author’s entire thought process.”

That’s why, if I have limited time but want to reach the core of an issue, I still choose to read. Not because a book is necessarily “better,” but because it is usually “heavier” in terms of intellectual weight.

Books Offer More Than Facts; They Offer a Structure for Thinking

One difference that video or short-form content can hardly replace is the system. A good book always has a clear structure: from the table of contents to the way arguments are developed and the tight connections between chapters. You aren’t just picking up scattered pieces of information; you are learning how to assemble them into a big picture.

In contrast, videos are often fragmented. You watch one clip after another, but they don’t necessarily have a common thread. The result? You “know” a lot of things, but you don’t “understand” any of them deeply.

“Knowing a lot doesn’t mean you understand—but deep understanding usually starts with holding a system.”

The Price of “Fast and Convenient”

There’s no denying the magic of AI and video in learning. But that extreme convenience comes with a consequence: the fragmentation of the mind.

When you open a video to learn, as soon as another tempting suggestion pops up, it’s easy to be pulled away. Learning is no longer a deep, focused process but a series of interruptions. On the other hand, reading is a “slow” act. That very pace forces you to pause, focus, and stay with an idea long enough to truly digest it.

“The difficulty of reading isn’t in reading the words—it’s in staying with a single thought long enough.”

Not Everything Requires a Book

Of course, books are not a “magic pill” for every situation. For practical skills like playing an instrument, coding, or specific manual tasks, a video tutorial is undoubtedly more effective. For simple tidbits of information, you don’t need to waste energy reading an entire chapter.

The core issue isn’t “to read or not to read,” but rather: Is what I’m learning worth the time for a deep dive?

“Choose your way of learning based on the nature of what you want to understand, not out of habit.”

So, is reading still necessary in the age of AI and video? The answer doesn’t lie in stubbornly defending paper pages or denying technology. It lies in your own goals.

If you just need quick information to solve an immediate problem, there are many tools better than books. But if you crave deep understanding, a solid mental framework, and a process of serious reflection—then a book remains your most reliable companion.

“Technology helps you go faster, but it doesn’t always help you go deeper.”

In a world racing at breakneck speed, persisting with a slow way of learning isn’t being outdated. It is a conscious choice to keep your mind from being swept away.

Through this post, I want to emphasize that every medium has its own value. My personal experience shows that reading is the best way to build “mental endurance” and establish the firmest foundation for thinking amidst a chaotic sea of information.

You may also like